Banned: New Rules Proposals
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Banned: New Rules Proposals
After looking over what some of you have said, I went over the rules, and the structure of the site.
Aside from a few improvements and tweaks, I don't see a reason to change anything.
The rules will remain the same; anything with material that could cause problems at work should be simply labeled "NSFW" (Not Safe For Work). Moderators should scan every new thread to be sure whether it is work safe or not.
The "back room" is gone- and that was the main objection we had.
Other than that, the site remains, as always MUZZLE FREE.
I'll let you all know when the ad campaign is going to begin.
Aside from a few improvements and tweaks, I don't see a reason to change anything.
The rules will remain the same; anything with material that could cause problems at work should be simply labeled "NSFW" (Not Safe For Work). Moderators should scan every new thread to be sure whether it is work safe or not.
The "back room" is gone- and that was the main objection we had.
Other than that, the site remains, as always MUZZLE FREE.
I'll let you all know when the ad campaign is going to begin.
_________________
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”- Samuel Adams
Re: Banned: New Rules Proposals
Err, no. We mods can't be arsed to read each and every thread and look for abnormalities. Our job is to execute moderation - not to actively look for things which require moderation. If we miss something, which is the most likely scenario, then people should notify us by either a personal message or a message in the mod thread.
Guest- Guest
Re: Banned: New Rules Proposals
Moderators should scan every new thread to be sure whether it is work safe or not.
Its a suggestion not an order, you lazy Zionist.
_________________
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”- Samuel Adams
Re: Banned: New Rules Proposals
So you needed an announcement to announce that there is nothing to announce?
Wow! Some tension between the administration and the hired hands?
J.B. wrote:Moderators should scan every new thread to be sure whether it is work safe or not.
Its a suggestion not an order, you lazy Zionist.
Wow! Some tension between the administration and the hired hands?

Lucious- Senior Member

- Number of posts: 142
Age: 30
Favorite Drinks: Champagne
Points: 1506
Registration date: 2008-09-24
Re: Banned: New Rules Proposals
Err, no.
a.) moderators aren't "hired", they're elected
b.) it was just a joke.
c.) except the lazy part.
a.) moderators aren't "hired", they're elected
b.) it was just a joke.
c.) except the lazy part.
_________________
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”- Samuel Adams
Re: Banned: New Rules Proposals
sniff sniff plug
_________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." Emerson

TJ- Mississippi River Cruiser

- Number of posts: 2788
Points: 2177
Registration date: 2008-07-03
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum









